May 22, 2013
-
The Law, The Sermon on the Mount, and True Christianity
I read someone’s blog where he critiqued the idea of “True Christians”. This person pointed out that Jesus stated that we are to follow the law of the old testament, and teach others to do the same. Conversely, he pointed out that Jesus also said not to follow the “eye for an eye” law. This person stated that Jesus, in just a matter of a few verses contradicted himself. He ended his conjecture with, Jesus wasn’t a ‘true Christian’.
That, I have to give him. Jesus wasn’t a true Christian… Jesus was a devout Jew who started a revolution within Judaism that eventually became Christianity. Jesus didn’t intend to start a religion, but instead, came to reveal true religion. If we read what Jesus’ brother James says about true religion, we find that true religion is taking care of the widows and orphans, and if we continue reading, we see that true religion leads us to look after the poor as well, and showing mercy to others as we’ve been shown mercy. James continued to say that it is good to follow the “royal law”. The royal law is “Love your neighbor as yourself” and is known as the royal law because this is the heart of the Kingdom of God. It is clear that James was more interested in the heart of the Law of Moses than the ritualistic aspect of it, which is why the entire book of James is void of using words such as “circumcision”, “cleansing”, or hinting at dietary restrictions. James’ point for writing is to show that love and faith are at the very center of the new covenant, and to be loving and faithful, to be truly religious, requires us to not simply offer lip service, but to be doers and hearers of the Word.
This shows that “true Christianity” does, in fact, exist, and with a proper understanding of scripture, we can see what “true Christianity” really is. Never mind the countless number of denominations and factions within Christianity. That’s a minor, but necessary inconvenience. We know what true Christianity is because it’s written in Scripture, clear as day.
Of course, we don’t have go to James to see what true Christianity is. Jesus says it himself. The entire flow of the Sermon on the Mount, found in Matthew, chapters 5-7 shows true Christianity. But to understand the entirety of the Sermon on the Mount, you have to read it in context. First, we have the Beatitudes, which blesses the people we wouldn’t typically expect to bless. I believe that the sermon was designed in such a way to put us in our rightful place before God. When we read that the meek will be the ones to inherit the earth, the merciful will receive mercy, and the peacemakers will be called “Children of God”, it’s quite humbling. From there, Jesus continues by giving the analogies of salt and light, which shows that what we do matters because the world will look to the followers of Christ for flavor and a way, or in other words, for direction, and a path. What was his answer for a direction and a path? The Law! But what is the Law? Jesus did say that not one tittle of the Law will be abolished… but he also said that he came to fulfill it. What does this mean? What could it possibly mean to fulfill the law, but not abolish it? Christians don’t follow the law today, do they?
Well… yeah… we do… Throughout the rest of the Sermon on the Mount, we read Jesus revealing the meaning hidden within the Law. He tore apart much of the Law saying, “You have heard that it was said… but I tell you…” Jesus, God incarnate, revealed the Kingdom of God within the Law, but what we see Jesus doing is setting up a new understanding, because many who followed the law had missed the point. They had missed the Kingdom of God. It wasn’t about the ritual, and it wasn’t about the punishment. The Law was originally set up to create a nation. That nation would give birth to a Messiah. That Messiah would set up a greater nation. That greater nation would set up the Kingdom of God. God will come to fulfill the Kingdom, and God will reign forever and ever.
But you see, the entire Sermon on the Mount tears apart the misunderstandings of Judaism in that time. It humbled the prideful, and it showed the prideful to have hope in God and not in their own works. Because it is God who is the giver of all good things at the end of the day. It is God who causes the sun to shine and the rain to fall on both the righteous and the unrighteous. No man can boast, but they can boast in the Lord God.Finally, near the end of the Sermon, Christ said “In everything, do to others what you would have them do to you. For this is the Law and the Prophets.” This is the climax of the Sermon on the Mount. Later, in Chapter 22, Jesus even says again, in case there is any confusion, that the entirety of the Law and the Prophets hangs on these two commandments: Love your neighbor as yourself, and Love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your mind. Jesus finished his sermon by summing up a few more points- First, “True Christians” will be known by their fruits. Second, there will be many people who claim to know the savior; many who claim to know his teachings, but in reality, they are prideful, hateful, hypocritical, spiteful people who never knew Jesus… who never understood his teachings… who misrepresented the the Kingdom of God and God’s righteousness. Lastly, in the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus told us to build our foundations on his teachings, because his teachings set up the Kingdom of God. True religion. True Christianity.
Comments (23)
Thanks for taking some considerable time to write this.
Well done brother. The law and the prophets all hang on those two great commandments. Love illuminates the intention and meaning of all things pertaining to our faith! Peace
Jmallory! You wrote a rebuttal post of @agnophilo ‘s post and did not reference him. You do remember who he is because you commented on his post. If done deliberately, that is disingenuous and unworthy of you.
@Lovegrove - It was deliberate, but not because I am unwelcoming of him. He will see it, I’m sure. This is not a response post in the classical sense, but rather a response to the gears grinding in my head. I don’t like to send people to other blogs, especially if there is great potential for further debate. It isn’t my style. There is no need to attempt to call me out, which is disingenuous and unworthy of you.
@Lovegrove - If I see it right this was a blog inspired by and not a word by word rebuttal
@Lovegrove - This post is not disingenuous or unworthy of @jmallory -
I think there is a certain kindness in the heart of @jmallory - and a desire to not cause unnecessary conflict.
Back to the post: I agree that some people were walking away from the law and thinking they had not broken it so Jesus pointed out that they were really breaking it in their heart.
In Revelation it speaks of a people who keep the Commandments of God and have the testimony of Jesus. The idea of Love God and Love Others as You Love Yourself is spelled out in the Ten Commandments. Because I love God, I obey. Because I love others, I obey. Why do I love God? Because He first loved me. Why do I love others? Because God lovrs them. How can I not love what God loves? Paul goes so far as to cry Abba, Father. How can I not love my Dad? If He says Go, how can I stay? If He says Remember, how can I forget? The Ten Commandments are love expressed toward God our Father and the brothers and sisters of the human race, my Father’s family. For others Jesus made sacrifices. Christians need to do a much better job following that example of love. Myself included.
@Lovegrove - Why aren’t you calling out Agno for all the posts he does where he actually copy and pastes what others said on their blog without giving a link or naming who the person is?
Link.
And a few things:
Lovegrove isn’t a “true” christian because he rebuked you publicly when he should’ve rebuked you privately first:
“If your brother sins against you, go and tell him his fault, between
you and him alone. If he listens to you, you have gained your brother.
But if he does not listen, take one or two others along with you, that
every charge may be established by the evidence of two or three
witnesses. If he refuses to listen to them, tell it to the church. And
if he refuses to listen even to the church, let him be to you as a
Gentile and a tax collector.” – (Matthew 18:15-17)
And you’re not a “true” christian because you, by blocking him without the slightest provocation, were not following the scripture that says to “be quick to hear, slow to speak, slow to anger”.
And jesus wasn’t following his own teachings (first quote) when he rebuked peter publicly (matthew 16:23)
There is no such thing as a “true” christian in the legalistic sense that people use the term. ANYONE can have scripture quoted against them, and quite easily. The fact that even christ isn’t a “true christian” by that legalistic standard should have, I should think, illustrated the fallacy of the label pretty well.
@agnophilo - I agree with some of what you said. I think people are very quick to judge. The legalistic standard that some people have certainly doesn’t quite make par as far as my understanding is concerned. I’ve been labeled a “fake Christian” because I believe in evolution, that the entire Bible isn’t meant to be taken completely literally, and that the earth is 4.5 billion years old, and the universe around 14 billion. All that aside, I take Jesus’ words very seriously, and I do trust in him as my Lord and Savior, God incarnate. Now, while we can’t necessarily determine what a “true” Christian is, we can determine what is true Christianity… and what is not Christianity. Of course, my own definition is a little more liberal than some, but I think Jesus is a little more inclusive than people give him credit for.
Lovegrove, though he is a bit of an annoyance to me, is a true Christian. Part of being a true Christian is to realize that you are bound to make mistakes, and certain “unChristian” aspects of our lives will arise from time to time. The nature of your assessment is right though. He should have come to me so we could discuss the situation. He made a mistake just like we all do. There is room for mistakes in Christianity.
As far as my perceived “mistake”, you are mistaken. There were thing he had written on here that I ended up deleting, and we had an entire conversation through messaging. I privately told him my frustrations and he publicly came back and attacked me. Blocking was the right course of action. You, yourself, know how much it takes for me to block someone. I’m not perfect. I deal with a lot of “unChristian” aspects of my life, but in that situation, I was very quick to hear, slow to speak, and slow to anger. I was certainly annoyed though.
I believe that Jesus’ public rebuke of Peter was something all the disciples needed to hear, so I think there is a different standard being applied there. Certainly all of them were thinking in human thoughts and not God’s thoughts. I would be. Then again, what do I know? I’m not Jesus… I can only interpret what I see.
@jmallory -
“I agree with some of what you said. I
think people are very quick to judge. The legalistic standard that some
people have certainly doesn’t quite make par as far as my understanding
is concerned. I’ve been labeled a “fake Christian” because I believe in
evolution, that the entire Bible isn’t meant to be taken completely
literally, and that the earth is 4.5 billion years old, and the universe
around 14 billion. All that aside, I take Jesus’ words very seriously,
and I do trust in him as my Lord and Savior, God incarnate. Now, while
we can’t necessarily determine what a “true” Christian is, we can
determine what is true Christianity… and what is not Christianity. Of
course, my own definition is a little more liberal than some, but I
think Jesus is a little more inclusive than people give him credit for.”
What is and is not true christianity? You just said countless christians think you’re not a true christian and you presumably think many of them are not true christians. Catholics think they’re the only true christians, protestants don’t think they’re christian at all, mormons think they’re the only ones getting into heaven, jews are still waiting for the messiah and think they’re god’s “chosen” people. Pro-life christians, pro-choice christians, evolutionists, creationists, liberals, conservatives, everyone in every direction thinks they’re right and everyone else is wrong. Which is fine, we’re entitled to our opinions. But what is nonsense is the claim that one group is following scripture when ALL of them follow it selectively, or ignorantly (not knowing about the scripture they don’t follow). And of course no one follows all the time even the bits they do follow. If I asked you if a member of the KKK was a true christian you’d probably say no. If I asked someone in the KKK if they thought you were a true christian, what do you think they would say?
“Lovegrove,
though he is a bit of an annoyance to me, is a true Christian. Part of
being a true Christian is to realize that you are bound to make
mistakes, and certain “unChristian” aspects of our lives will arise from
time to time. The nature of your assessment is right though. He should
have come to me so we could discuss the situation. He made a mistake
just like we all do. There is room for mistakes in Christianity.”
There is wisdom in doing that, though I think when someone blocks you all that is left is to shine a spotlight on their crappy behavior and maybe shame them into behaving better. Blocking people is crappy, and I don’t see what he did to deserve it. I’ve only ever blocked one person, and that was for writing half a dozen blogs bashing and lying about me.
“As
far as my perceived “mistake”, you are mistaken. There were thing he
had written on here that I ended up deleting, and we had an entire
conversation through messaging. I privately told him my frustrations and
he publicly came back and attacked me. Blocking was the right course of
action. You, yourself, know how much it takes for me to block someone.
I’m not perfect. I deal with a lot of “unChristian” aspects of my life,
but in that situation, I was very quick to hear, slow to speak, and slow
to anger. I was certainly annoyed though.”
I don’t even block loborn (who comments on basically every blog I write btw). I don’t see what he did that angered you so much. Everyone has a bad day now and then.
“I believe that Jesus’
public rebuke of Peter was something all the disciples needed to hear,
so I think there is a different standard being applied there. Certainly
all of them were thinking in human thoughts and not God’s thoughts. I
would be. Then again, what do I know? I’m not Jesus… I can only
interpret what I see.”
So scripture is more like a series of guidelines than actual rules?
I’ll start from the bottom and work my way up. I see scripture more as a set of guidelines. Scripture is there to show us what is wise vs. what is foolish- What is godly vs. what is ungodly. I don’t believe we have a God that demands we behave. I believe we have a merciful God that knows what is best for us and leads us to do good, to love God, to care for creation, and care for one another.
As far as what Lovegrove did, I may have over reacted a bit… but only a bit… it was 3 in the morning after all. But as you’ve mentioned: we all have bad days. What angered me the most was his lack of conviction, even after expressing, privately, my frustrations. I knew I could not get anywhere, and I knew as soon as he publicly posted what was going on in a private message, that I had to block him simply for the sake of civility. I did read his blog too. I was curious… and he is still publicly ridiculing me. I’m not down with that at all. It’s demeaning. You know it just as much as I do. It’s all good though. I’ll lift the block sometime. I just don’t like being attacked.
Finally, with faith, you take your chances. After studying scripture (not just mine, but other religions as well), I’ve come to my own conclusions, and that’s what everyone has to do. They need to take their time to research and find exactly what makes sense to them. I believe that God often leads us to different conclusions. Is there more than one truth? I don’t know… but we live in a very diverse world, and to be unified within diversity is a very beautiful thing, and is something I wish people would strive for more. As for the person in the KKK… I tend to give people the benefit of the doubt. Racism is a terrible, ungodly thing… However, so greed, so is pride, so is over indulgence… And I know that I can be greedy, prideful, and gluttonous. We all need to work on ourselves. Also, it’s like I mentioned before: Jesus said that we will be known by the fruit we bear. If there is a Christian who is not bearing good fruit, he/she probably needs a little more accountability.
@agnophilo - @jmallory
- Lovegrove, though he is a bit of an annoyance to me, is a true Christian.
He has never claimed to be a Christian as far as I know.
@musterion99 - He is. He’s told me his background before.
@jmallory - He said he’s gone to church before when he was younger but he doesn’t claim to be a Christian.
@jmallory - I guess asking you two to take it private is a bit late. I should have know it was being done
@trunthepaige - I tried to make it as private as I could until agno started talking about it. Not that it’s his fault, I just don’t like to air my dirty laundry.
@musterion99 - I guess from what I gathered he was a Christian… I could be (and probably am) wrong. It seems to me that he just doesn’t really like fundamentalists… But I never read his blogs either, so what do I know?
@jmallory - I understand its grown out of control. Its happens to me a lot more than you. Might be that i am a bit of a fighter
@trunthepaige - Well, you know… I’m not trying to feud, which is why I ended up blocking him. I guess he took it a little too personally, but oh well… He’ll be over it soon. I’ll be over it. We can both move on.
Does dogma get set in stone too quickly?
When some points shine brightly in the present?
Who am I to judge but to point out what has gone on
And let the pages fall where they may.
The book is being written in my heart
And an eraser is allowed to be used.
Those that throw away the pen to write
Is like throwing away the Holy Spirit.
PPhilip 2013 May 22.
Now, we can not pick and chose which of the Ten Commandments we keep can we? As has the Ten Commandments been done away with?
The answer is no to both questions.
Then why does it seem Religious people decide which of the Ten Commandments too keep and which to toss.
Scripture tells us that if we break one of them, we have broken them all.
So this would mean we need to keep all the Ten Commandments and means the 4th one also.
Because that one was never done away with, nor did the Saviour rise on any other day but the day of the 4th Commandment., Bro. Doc
Your blogs are truly awesome I have no words to praise for your blogs.
best injury lawyer