Jimmy's Awesome Playlist


A Peek in My Mind

Thursday, 02 July 2009

  • Athiest-ish?

    I voted for the idea of an "Atheist-ish" site. I'm a Christian, and a strong one, but I don't think it's fair that there is group for us and not for the Atheists. Really, it isn't that big of a deal to me. I just find it very, very unfair. I also think that the ones who complain about this a lot are giant babies though too. Seriously... But if it were the other way around, and Atheists had an ish site... Christians would probably be complaining a lot too. It's sad, really...
    Let's look at it like this:

    No one complains about not having a "Jewish-ish" site.
    No one complains about not having an "Islam-ish" site.
    No one complains about not having a "Buddhist-ish" site.
    No one complains about not having a "Mormon-ish" site.

    This really shows how pathetic both sides can be.

    But what is this complaint really about? Are there really people who want their writings featured on an "ish" site they can relate to so they can network a little better? Or do they merely want an "ish" site just because the Christians have one... for the sake of fairness? My guess is more of the latter than the former (not that there is a problem with either way). If this is the case, I think those who complain about a lack of an "atheist-ish" sub-community should not only try to get their site up in as many ways as they can, they should try to get other "ish" sites up and running for the sake of fairness too.

    There are many ways to go about this too.
    First of all, you can create your own page, similar to catpooish. It isn't the same, but it is something... and it might give Xanga the idea.
    Secondly, you can submit your stuff to Revelife. Sometimes they feature blogs from atheists... because we can all learn from each other. They just won't feature anything that mocks Christianity... and rightly so... but again, it is worth a try. And who cares if the Christians complain? They will just do it on an "Athieist-ish" site anyway.
    Thirdly, if it really is that big of a deal to you, boycott Xanga until they put up an "Atheist-ish" sub-community. I know that nothing is as good as Xanga, but if you want to get serious, you have to do some serious things. If Xanga starts losing it's more outspoken atheists (or the sensitive atheist supporters) left and right, they will know what the problem is.
    There are plenty of things you can do to get a site up and running. Just be creative.

    My biggest suggestion, however, is just let it go. Even though I think it is fair and I support the idea of "Atheist-ish" I believe that silence, often speaks louder than anything. But I also think that we should be careful about the divisions we place in Xanga. Xanga is a tight community and it is good to preserve it the best we can, while sharing each other's ideas and creeds.

    So what do you think? Should Xanga put up Atheist-ish?

Monday, 29 June 2009

  • Michael Jackson- Remembering the King of Pop

      As cliche as it might be, I am writing about the death of the greatest pop-icon of all time, anyway.
    This is a huge loss. Seriously. I still can't believe this had happened... regardless of how expected this tragedy might be.

    I first heard while I was at work. One of our regular customers came in and said, "Hey, did you hear who died today?"
    "Yeah," I said. "Farrah Fawcett?"
    "Well yeah, her too. But Michael Jackson died too!"
    My heart dropped. "You're kidding me, right?"
    "No! I heard it on the radio on my way here. I was a big fan. (This is a man about 60 years old) This is too bad. I grew up on him!"

    Naturally, I didn't want to believe him, being a big MJ fan, myself. I called my dad, because I figured he was watching the news anyway.

    The phone rang a few times and my dad picked up.
    "Hello."
    "Hi dad. Are you watching the news?" I asked.
    "Yes. Why?"
    "Is Michael Jackson dead? Someone came in and said he was dead."
    "No. He went into cardiac arrest and he wasn't breathing. They rushed him to the hospital, but no one knows if he is dead yet. Everyone is saying it doesn't look good though." my dad explained.
    "Oh, ok. Well, keep me updated."

    After that, a few people came into the Movie Gallery talking about how MJ had a heart attack. By this point, I was freaking out, quietly to myself.

    My dad called about 15 minutes later.
    "Jimmy, they are saying that he is in a coma... so... say a prayer."

    The only thing I could say was, "God... please..."

    A woman approached the counter and was on her cell phone (something that really really really bothers me!).
    "What! You're kidding! He is not! You are lying. Ok... well, call me back."
    "So you've heard about Michael Jackson?" I asked.
    She said, "Yes. That was my sister on the phone. She said one station says he was dead, but another said he was in a coma."

    After the woman left, I got another phone call.

    It was my dad.

    "Jimmy, they've confirmed it. Michael Jackson. is. dead."

    When I didn't think my heart could sink any further, it did.

    When I got off work, I came home. A response of one of my roommates was "Good!"

    Good? All freakishness aside... this is a good thing? This man was somebody's son. He was a brother to eight brothers and sisters. He was a father. He was a genius in his own right. His art is spectacular... and this is good?

    I don't care about his private life. Who knows if he really was a child molester? He was acquitted. What good is our court system if people can't trust it? And I say, if he was acquitted, then he never did it. If he did, forgive, forget, move on. Personally, I don't think he had it in him to do such a horrible thing, but that is besides the point. No matter how weird he was, no matter how strange he made himself look, no matter the controversy and the rumors, he was still a human being. He was still a person... and he was a person who was a GREAT entertainer. The true king of pop.
    Michael Jackson

    1958-2009

    My prayers go out to his family.

Monday, 22 June 2009

  • Anarchism

    Shalom.
    I haven't been on and updated for a while. For that, I apologize.

    I guess I haven't had much to write about lately. It seems like I am sputtering out the same stuff over and over again and looking forward to the same people who agree and disagree with what I have to say... It seems like the same stuff all over again. By now, everyone on Xanga knows my view on abortion, gay marriage, pacifism, government, and just about everything else. It just gets old, writing the same thing in different ways. In fact, It is so old, I can't believe we still have the same hot-button issues as we had 10 years ago... Except for the global warming issue, that is...

    Anyway, I want to say a little something about what I believe about the church and the government... again... something I always talk about...

    If you look throughout history, you will see that anytime government is fused with religion, it causes problems for not only the religion, but for the government itself. Rarely, are the two able to work together.

    I am an anarchist... But I believe I am anarchist by default...

    We can get into a lot on this topic... about hidden meanings... about hermeneutics, whatever... but I believe that it is very difficult for a person to be a Christian and support government.

    Now before anybody goes crazy over what I just said, I believe that supporting government and obeying one's governing authorities are two completely different ideas. I will not support the idea of an unjust war (if there is such thing as a just war), however, I will submit myself to the governing authorities if we were to have a draft and I was selected for "service". That isn't saying that I would go to war, but I would proudly go to jail instead... and that is still being submissive.

    People love to argue and bicker about what it means to be in the world but not of it. Some say the Amish have it all wrong because they separate themselves, completely. Some say that there are those who spend their time ministering in bars is being too far into the world. Personally, I respect the conviction of both parties, however, I feel that it is important for Christians to stay neutral to the government. What I mean is, stay submissive, follow the laws, and pay taxes to the government, but don't be involved in voting, any type of enforcement (whether it be via the military or law enforcement), and anything that could put you in a situation where you may have to pick one view over what you should believe as a Christian... and it is difficult, if not, impossible to find an area in government where you would not have to go against your convictions as a Christian. I don't buy into the "voting for the lesser of two evils" mentality... because that way, you are still going against some strong convictions.

    That is why I say that every Christian is an Anarchist at heart. It might sound like a contradiction in terms, but it really isn't. Let me explain:

    Anarchism is not a rejection of government. It is just an idealistic form of altruism. It is not impossible, but it certainly takes a lot of discipline. So, to go on further- Anarchy is not a chaotic state... not in an altruistic society, anyway. As an anarchist, I can see that the government has authority over me... because I am not blind... I question that authority, naturally... but nevertheless, I am bound to that authority, but ideally, a society based off of altruism and self-motivation is the key to success in a state of Anarchy... which in all reality, this is what extreme conservatives would like to see more of, anyway. The problem is, most people want to see a person who has authority, like a president or a king, or what have you. But if we read the book of Judges, we will see that it was never God's intention for His people (Jew or Christian [I believe it can pertain to both]) to have a ruler other than Him.

    One of my all time favorite quotes is from a Christian Anarchist named, Ammon Hennacy.
    "An Anarchist is anyone who doesn't need a cop to tell him what to do."
    and another one like it,
    "Oh, judge, your damn laws: the good people don't need them and the bad people don't follow them, so what good are they?"

    If you ask me, he raises a good point... because ideally, if we were all Christians, and we were all holding each other accountable, we really wouldn't need governing authorities. And even in the stage of life we are in right now, we still don't. I believe that God's justice is over all of us... in one form or another... and I will not limit the power of my God... because I know he isn't tucked away safe in a little box... because my God sees all, hears all, and knows all... and I know that those who will make him angry will see his wrath in some form. If this is the nature of my God, what more do we need?

    A good website someone pointed out to me the other day: www.jesusradicals.com
    Check it out. They even have a section about Christian Anarchy!

Friday, 22 May 2009

Thursday, 21 May 2009

Wednesday, 13 May 2009

  • Chinese Restaurants

    Other cultures fascinate me... especially if they have funny accents. I feel like when I walk into a Chinese restaurant, I am walking into a circus.


    I'm not saying that the Chinese are freaks or anything. I am just saying that it seems like part of the experience of going into a Chinese restaurant (besides the AMAZING food) is the culture. I guess, when I walk in, I expect some form of entertainment. Here are three ways I expect to be entertained:

    1) I expect funny accents. Allow me to write out a scenario.
    Jimmy and friends walk into a Chinese restaurant. The hostess greets us with a smile and says, "Herro. For here, to go?"
    "For here." Jimmy says, with a smile in return.
    The hostess says, "Ok. Forrow me prease." and she sits Jimmy and friends at a table. "For drink?" she asks.
    "I'll have a water" one friend says.
    "Water?" she repeats.
    "I'll have a water too." another friend requests.
    Again, the hostess repeats, "Water?"
    Another friend orders a Dr. Pepper.
    "Doctah Peppah." repeats the hostess.
    "And I'll have a Pepsi" says Jimmy.
    "A Pessi" says the hostess. "One minute prease. I'll be back."
    10 minutes later, Jimmy's pepsi is gone and she asks, "You wan more drink?"
    "Yes please" Jimmy says.
    "Pessi?" She asks again.
    "Yes" Jimmy says with a snicker.

    And this is part of the experience at a Chinese restaurant. I don't think it would be the same if the host, hostess, waiter, or waitress could actually speak English. Which brings me to my second expectation.

    2) I expect the Chinese language. Another scenario.
    Yesterday, I went to one of the local chinese restaurants. I was waiting in the line where some dude cooks my food. I was standing in line for about a minute before he took my raw food to cook. When he came out of the kitchen to cook my food, a waitress went up to him and started yelling at him (that is what it seemed like, anyway... I don't know. I don't speak the language.) After she "yelled" at him, he said something back to her. She looked at me, looked back at him, and said something else. The cook looked at me, said something and the waitress looked at me again and laughed.
    "Great!" I thought... "I'm the butt of a joke... I think?" I had no choice but to kind of laugh a little as if I were in on their Chinese speaking joke...

    And this too, is part of the experience at a Chinese restaurant. It is kind of fun to not know if you are being talked about... it is a scary feeling, but in a strange way, intense.

    3) I expect a mini Buddha statue (or some sort of Chinese statue)

    The reason why is because I think it's funny. When I'm leaving I don't rub his belly... I pinch his nipples instead. That always gets a laugh out of the hostess.

    Do you expect to be entertained when you go to a Chinese restaurant?

Wednesday, 06 May 2009

  • There is not a more horrible day in all of history

    I knew this day was coming for eight years now...

    ...but I never would have imagined it would hurt like this.


    I always imagined the Earth stopping its rotation when this day would come...

    ...so far, it hasn't happened.


    You've given us eight happy years...

    ....and I'm so sad to see it end.


    It is a sad, horrible day, indeed...

    ...how will we ever get through this?






    Tonight is your series finale, Scrubs. You will surely be missed.

    I will miss Elliot and her all around hotness.
    I will miss Turk and the one testicle he has left.
    I will miss JD and his wild imagination and inner monologue.
    I will miss Dr. Cox and his long-winded rants.
    I will miss Dr. Kelso and his cruelty, yet hidden compassion.
    I will miss Ted and his sad life.
    I will miss.... Janitor!
    I will miss The Todd and his high fives.
    I will miss Elliot and her all around hotness.
    I will miss Elliot and her all around hotness.
    But I won't miss you, Carla.
    Scrubs, you will be missed...

    I'll cry quietly to myself later.

    Scrubs Series Finale Tonight at 8/7 central on ABC.

    (Actually, this is being billed as a season finale... there is a chance it could come back for a 9th season.)

Monday, 04 May 2009

  • So You Want To Be A Christian Nation? Part Two

    Shalom.
    In case you missed part one, here is the link. I suggest you read that before you read part two.

    Last time I talked about how, in order to be a Christian nation, we need to change the constitution to make us a true Christian state. I also pointed out that we would need a completely different monetary system- one that wouldn't upset the very jealous God we Christians worship.

    I find it ironic that you can find, "In God We Trust" on our currency.

    What I'm saying isn't a brand new idea, obviously, however, this subject is something that Christians ought to think about. Who is the "we" our currency is talking about? Not everyone believes in God. Some believe in a god or gods, but its (or their) name(s) isn't (aren't) "God". However, our currency seems to suggest that we (Americans) trust in God. Not all of us do. In fact, many Christians don't even put their trust in God. Many people put their trust in (drum roll please?) ...MONEY! Again, I blame it on our system of capitalism.

    So does the phrase, "In God We Trust" really belong on our money. I don't believe it does. I think that mammon is part of the world and should not taint the church. It is just another one of those things on the dollar bill that has become part of its intricate design- easy to overlook. Really, I don't feel comfortable knowing that I will be trusting my money to put food on my table and not God. What I'm saying is, if "In God We Trust" is meant to be a friendly reminder telling us to pay attention to what we are investing in, it doesn't work, and it really only serves as a contradiction. In a sense, this forces many people to live a lie.

    The solution to this problem is simple- though it may cost a lot. Take "In God We Trust" off of the American currency. It doesn't need to be on our money and causes God to look at us and say, "Really? You trust me? You trust me, but you've refused to give that homeless man even a penny of what you've earned?" Remember- how you treat others is how you treat God. What you give others is what you give to God. If you want to be a Christian nation, trust God. Give away all that you have. See how God takes care of you. You may not have everything you want, but God will give you everything you need... and you would be doing this so others can have what they need. That would make one's spirit beautiful.

    I would also say that, along with taking "In God We Trust" off of our currency, we should take out "One nation under God" from the Pledge of Allegiance. But I'm not going to say that. I am taking it a step further. I'm saying get rid of the entire Pledge of Allegiance... if you want to be a Christian nation (you can read some interesting stuff about the Pledge of Allegiance on Tom's blog).  The reason why I say this is because as you recite the Pledge of Allegiance, you are declaring the USA your home. Is it really your home though? I don't think it is. We are citizens of another kingdom. This makes us ambassadors. We are here temporarily and our purpose is threefold. 1) Worship God- serve only him (when we serve "the least of these, we serve God as well). 2) To let the world know about Christ (this is something that is less of a duty and more of something we shouldn't help. The spirit should be overflowing in us, so we would have no choice but to tell others the source of our joy). 3) Help bring Heaven to Earth (the work of an ambassador- to represent his home)

    That is all we are here for- and it is only temporary. Soon, we will be with God in our true home- the kingdom of God, which we are to help bring to earth. However, if Heaven is our true home, why would we declare the USA as our home? Is it because the USA seems more tangible then the Kingdom of God? Is it because we have a group of rulers that we can see? Is it because here, we have a sense of "freedom." I've said it before and I will say it again. The term, "freedom" is relative. If all of our freedoms are ripped away from us, God is still in Heaven and Christ still died for us. That is all the freedom we really need- that is, the peace and rest Christ has given us in and through him. I could still feel free if I can't speak my mind (granted, it would not be fun). I could still feel free if I can't worship God anywhere outside my home (I would probably do it anyway- but that is an entire different blog altogether). I would still have my thoughts. I would still have my beliefs, and NOBODY can take that away.

    Anyway, back on topic, when you say the pledge, you are claiming that we are one nation under God... this is a dilemma. Saying this can equate to saying that if you are not "under God" you are not a citizen of the USA or if you are in the USA, you are automatically under God. I have a problem with this. First, I want to explain that I do believe the USA and everyone in it is "under God". That is my belief and since it is my belief, I say this is an accurate statement. However, we dwellers of the USA have a freedom of religion which is protected by the first amendment of the US Constitution. Not everyone believes in God or they may believe in a different god. But when they recite the Pledge of Allegiance, they are forced to say that they are under God (spiritually, they are, but in their own mind, they are not). Perhaps "forced" is the wrong word, but there is only one Pledge of Allegiance for the USA. But when you are saying that you pledge your allegiance to the USA, you are pledging your allegiance to God. Otherwise, you are not really pledging your allegiance. This goes against our very constitution, making it a contradiction to what the US actually stands for, thus, technically voiding the Pledge of Allegiance. Which to a Christian, this should be ok... because this is not our true home. We are simply visiting and making the best of our stay.

    But we are not a Christian nation. If we were, we shouldn't have a pledge of allegiance. Our pledge of allegiance should be our constant prayers to God. He is the only one we should be pledging our allegiance to, anyway.

    So you want to be a Christian nation?

    Step One: Rewrite the Bill of Rights
    Step Two: Find a monetary system that does not cause us to put our money before God.
    Step Three: Remove "In God We Trust" from our currency- unless you really are trusting God.
    Step Four: Get rid of the Pledge of Allegiance

Monday, 27 April 2009

  • So You Want To Be A Christian Nation? Part One

    Shalom.
    I think I am starting a series... I just have too much to say under this topic to keep it contained in one single post. First, though, I want to say that I CRINGE when I hear that the US is a Christian Nation. It is not, nor will it ever be... not with the system that the forefathers have set up, anyway. Secondly, I will define what I mean, and I assume, what most people mean, when I say, "Christian Nation". 

    A Christian nation is an entire country of people, devoted to following the teachings of Christ, or an  Ekklesia (church) if you will. From this definition, we can already see that the USA, is not, and under the constitution, can not be a Christian nation. We have the freedom to follow any religion (or lack-there-of) we choose. Of course, this isn't a new concept to anybody. However, for the sake of my point, I feel it is necessary to reiterate that point strongly. You see, if we truly are a Christian nation, this is unacceptable, as it is clearly written that if there are those who continue with unrepented sin, they should be removed from among the body of Christ. Now, if we are a Christian nation, which we are NOT, we would understand that we, living in a community of fellowship with Christ, should not let this body, this community, this ekklesia, show any wrinkle or blemish. We would have to remove the evil person from among us.

    This poses a problem to this country which, supposedly, had been founded on Christian principles. When the Bill of Rights was written, George Mason and James Madison (deists- not Christians) had in mind that Americans should be free to worship or not worship how they please, and the exercise could not be controlled by the state. <--It seems natural, based off of the first amendment, that there would need to be a separation of Church and State, yet, it seems as though it should be natural to a Christian as well, as we are to be in the world, but not of the world.

    So, just how are we, the United States of America, a Christian nation? How is it possible, under our constitution, to be a Christian nation? Is it the idea that the majority of the US claims Christianity as their religion? That doesn't make this nation a "Christian nation." Is it our principles? Is it the American dream that makes us a Christian Nation? Absolutely not!

    Our entire system is corrupt. Capitalism and Christianity can not coexist. Especially, in this day and age, it is the most evil idea that has crept into the minds and philosophies of not only Americans, but internationally, as well... and the idea is still a growing one. The problem with Capitalism, as common knowledge suggests, is that as the rich get richer, the poor get poorer. The majority have to suffer so that a few can live as they please. Yet, if you grew up as an American, you were probably taught that Capitalism is the best economical system the world has had yet. I disagree... but that is what I was taught too. I will agree that Capitalism works (obviously not too well, as we've seen in the economy)... but that is all it does. It doesn't help.

    Take this financial crisis for instance. A lot of the bailout money ended up going into the pockets of those who work to keep the businesses running, and it wasn't used how it had been intended to be used, that is, it wasn't used to actually help the businesses, themselves. That is what capitalism does. It keeps a corrupted heart corrupt, and it corrupts the hearts of those that are uncorrupted.

    Capitalism idolizes mammon (money). This entire country idolizes capitalism. And if the Empire is idolizing capitalism, which idolizes mammon, then WE ARE IDOLATERS. This is when we really need to look at what Jesus says, "A slave can not serve two masters. Either he will love one and hate the other, or he will be devoted to one and despise the other. You cannot server both, God and mammon."

    There are those that are reading this that will know exactly what I am talking about when they find themselves trying to defend mammon instead of God's own words. There will be others who will not catch it... because no one wants to believe that something that has been a part of them for so long could, in all reality, be evil.

    So you want to be a Christian nation?

    Step one: Rewrite the Bill of Rights.
    Step two: Find a monetary system that does not cause us to put our money before God.

Saturday, 25 April 2009

  • The Community of The Church and the Godhead

    I find it incredible, the many ways we have been created in Elohim's image.
    Take the trinity as an example.
    God, by his very nature is communal. He is three in one. Three persons living as one God.
    Likewise, we are many people, living as one family.
    This is one of many purposes of Christianity.

    The church is a family, and because we are a family, we are one, just as God, though He is three, is one. Community makes us whole. It turns us into a body under the headship of Christ. And as Christ is the head and the fellowship of believers is the body, that makes us one with God as well. Though still unequal as He is the head and we are the body- the body receives its message from the head and acts accordingly. (1 Cor.17-20)

    Paul understood this idea completely. He shows our wholeness by community in another spectacular way: The Bride and Groom analogy, as found in Eph. 5:25-27 and 2 Cor. 11:2. And God shows this by direct Revelation to John.
    The body of Christ (the ekklesia or church) is His bride and He is the groom. And just as scripture says, "For this reason, a man must leave his father and mother and be united with his wife, and they will become one flesh." So just as a bride and groom are one, we become one, but not equal, with God as the husband leads his wife. Through this, we become complete.

    This is why the church must be a tight, loving community... being complete with God, through God, and by God. It is only through this that we can bring heaven to earth. And in order for us to be complete by God, we need to be pure.
    Purity comes through the blood of Christ.
    The Holy Spirt, then, dwells within us, connecting us to the Father.

    When we are connected with the Father, we are made complete. We are whole.
    Simply Beautiful.

Chatboard (4)

  • jmallory
    @HiNRGirl - lol It's no big deal... I am sick of it too.. which is why a recent post of mine was about abortion and how we can find common ground between pro-choice and pro-life... also, the one I rec'd was pretty funny, and he was looking for readers, that is why I rec'd it. :) thanks for letting m
  • HiNRGirl
    I just thought I'd let you know, to be safe: I just left a pulse about being sick of abortion stuff on Xanga, then remembered you'd recc'd a post about abortion, and I thought I'd let you know, I WASN'T referring to you. :P Actually I thought your recc was by someone else who's pro-choice and has m
  • talhashahidk
    start getting up early. you will know what you are missing a love your Rihanna post
  • Googim19
    thank U for accepting! (^0^)

jmallory

  • Visit jmallory's Xanga Site
    • Name: Jimmy
    • Birthday: 7/11/1986
    • Gender: Male
    • Member Since: 9/24/2007
    • Premium

About Me

  • I am a Christian. I am an anarchist. I am a pacifist. I am a listener. I am an observer. I am a feeler. I am a reader. I am a lover. I am a joker. I am made in the image of God. I am Jimmy. Hi, how ya doin?